Page 2 Inventors History and the Multi Lever Phenomenon plus one of my magnetic motor designs.
Page 2 Index
1 Magnetic motor design.
2 V Gate magnet motors and how to get them to work.
3 Inventors history.
4 Can gravity be use as fuel.
5 Hydrogen Peroxide Fuel Reactor Power Station
6 Beam Engines
New posted 20/07/ 2009 >
New posted 26/06/2009 >
New 11th July 2009>
Evidence to the balanced nature of the multi lever wheels, the lever wheel pictured is less than 3.5 % off the true balance and takes a very little force to rotate.
New add on 16/11/08 >
New 6/12/2008 >
Page 2 ©
1 Magnetic Motor design New drawing posted 16th February 2009
Note, The use of strong earth magnets will course a flux jam in most magnet motor designs and the weaker magnets demagnetize, so below is the best way to use the strong earth magnets in a stand alone magnet motor.
This design capitalizes on the natural flux flow of the large stator magnets from the weak point of a magnets pole (middle of the magnet), to the strong point of the magnets pole (end of the magnet), the longer the stator magnet the larger the rotors attraction parts movement, (the bigger the rotor) see figure 1 below. Note this motor can also be used in disc formats in sandwiched stator and rotor sets. If you know why V gate magnet designs nearly work then you will see this is the next step.
figure 1 shows two stator permanent magnets, and just one rotor set of permanent magnets wherein there would be many sets of each per motor, There is a permanent magnets flux shield systems that creates a percentage magnetic flux shield for the magnets. The shields may be constructed of any suitable material or combination of materials, they do not need to be 100% only weaken the magnetic flux. It may be better to use coil shields instead of or as well as shields, the electricity generated in the coil shields can then drive a conventional DC motor that would be attached to the rotor and help drive the rotor. Also figure 1 shows the need to experiment with magnet shapes, numbers, magnets angles, and permanent magnets shielding systems to maximize performance. Instead of or as well as shielding you can use distance by keeping the strong point away from the working area but requires longer stator magnets, it is possible to use two smaller stator magnets joined together but is not preferred.
Option Two, the repelling
coil option using magnetic metal (iron) cores. Repelling coils rotors
containing magnetic metal at the centre of repelling coils, so the metal
core is pulled along the stators magnetic flux and when it needs to
escape, the repelling coil is energized, not only escaping but giving
the rotor a repelling push. It may be possible to configure these coils,
so as they run along the stators flux flow, they build up there own
charge and starts the repelling automatically, if not they can be energized by the charging coils, generator, and battery’s, switched
by a armature or electronically when required. RC and GC may be frame
mounted instead of or as well as rotor mounted.
Figure 3 shows the side
view of figure 2 wherein you can see that each rotor has its own
generator this is instead of a gearing option, two can be used to
energize the repelling coils, and two
can be used for output, or each can have a duel function, or the rotors
may contain there own charging coils, magnets, capacitors, battery's,
and wiring. The hatched lines with CM = conventional DC motor that would
be attached to the rotor and help drive the rotor in some options.
I will be posting some drawings of this motor in a disc rotor format when I get the time, these are where the rotor magnet are side ways mounted on a rotor disc that over lap the stator magnets, this allows a long array of north south, north south stator magnets and south north, north south, south north array of rotors, the advantage of this format can be wide disc rotors using longer more powerful magnet that use both sides of the of there magnetic poles with stator magnet on both sides, to maximise both sides of the long stator magnets two or more sets of rotors can be used in each of the stators magnets half's. There are to many combinations of part numbers and magnet polarities to be cover on such a small web site so you will have to use your imagination. I am also looking at solid state magnet rotors having castled like edges to form blocks to run up the stators weak to strong points.
By using the technology of my above magnetic motor it is also possible to get V Gate design to work, by using an array of charging coils strategically positioned means that you can build up a good charge in capacitors and battery's systems, this can fire attracting or repelling magnets at the end of the gates to pull or push the magnets into the next cycle, (or they can fire solenoid to lift the drive magnets over the gate but this is not preferred as it take more energy and slows the rotor) you can use proximity or cam switches to fire the coils at the exact location and time. if the V gate motor is driving a generator then you can channel some of the power back instead of or as well as using the charging coils or use the surplus energy from the charging coils instead of or as well as a generator. Note V gate motors will work with the V used as the rotor and the drive magnet as the stator or the V magnets used as the stator and the drive magnets used as the rotor or both option can be used, V gate can work as a staggered array in a line or layered and stacked or both option can apply, the numbers of V magnets and drive magnet per V gate can vary. All of my magnet motor ideas can be used on V gate designs, even the iron core option wherein they would form the V array. Some people have suggested a cam system to lift the drive magnets over the gate but this will increase the negative forces at the worsted time and kill it dead, whereas building up an electrical charge over the length of the V and then fire repelling coils at optimum time the motor is accelerated into the next cycle this increases the motors RPM. By using longer drive magnets means The V magnet size and V size can be increased so the motors can be scale up. Add on, the same principles will apply to any magnetic motor that uses the weak point to the strong point drive systems, this is because you have good working distances before you hit the strong point thus a good charge can be built up by the charging coils and stored and then use to escape the strong points. Note by using joined together magnets as the drive magnet you will ruing the magnetic flux patterns so do not join more than two drive magnets together.
Note, all of the above mentioned options can be used with the Higher and Lower magnet arrays type (where the magnets get closer and closer to the drive magnet )of motors as well.
360 Flat spiral magnet array motors with Optional tilted out of balance drive magnet rotors, using gravity assisted strong point escape, this motor is a weak point to the strong point large drive magnets motor so would also use any of the above mentioned options, The drive magnets would be mounted across one half of the motors diameter on the stator or rotor depending on which option is used. Flat spiral magnet arrays are the way forward as they are ideal for disc formats which is better than V gates. I will be posting Drawings of this and some of the many variations of it as soon as I get time. Note the spiral array can be laid out in 2 or 3 turns pattern over the disc or 2 or 3 spirals over the disc.
Superconductor magnetic shields
Just to let you all know that I have been looking at permanent magnets motors for well over 30 years, this was the turning point because with the discovery of a 100% shielding ( superconductor) I discovered that 100% shields need to be kept at very low temperature that require a energy input so are not very helpful, this made me look at percentage shields and attracting magnet, thus the design above, I am very confident it will work but the large stator magnets are to expensive at about £2,000 pound and are a custom build, this would be reduced with mass production though, my design was meant to be a 24hr battery car charger. I will build it in time but I have a lot of designs to built that will not cost £2,000 pounds.
Note, 100% magnetic shielding will act like a repelling Magnet so is not the answer, percentage shielding is better!
3 Inventors History
and the Multi Lever Phenomenon
The Multi Lever Phenomenon
How it was discovered
It was lucky at the time I was looking at fluid weight transfer systems using leverage so it clicked I could use as many levers as I liked for a pair of reservoirs and the lever system would be in a good state of balance, thus by tapping the leverage of all the falling levers you could make a leverage win scenario, if the leverage of one lever could not do a task then just keep adding more levers.
The Multi Lever Phenomenon
Some of the advantages of using the Multi Lever Phenomenon
1. By adding more levers and or adjusting there ratios a leverage win scenario maybe gained for a given task required to be done by the levers.
2. If a higher number of levers are used on a wheel in a even manner then the wheel requires a smaller degree turn to reset (the lever system) the next pair of levers for there fall, thus the wheel should be in a greater state of balance than a wheel with a lower number of levers percentage wise, thus the ratios are in favour of leverage gained. If this is not correct then the wheel mounted levers will rotate the wheel in a imbalance state!
Note if you do not have a sufficient numbers of levers then the phenomenon will not work. See the Falkirk Wheel Scenario's on page 3 that use the multi lever phenomenon to gain rotary energy from the input of gravity's potential kinetic energy.
One of my Experiments
This experiment had 32 pivoting weighted levers (see photo below), each weight weighed 2.25kg. When a weight of 2.25kg was placed on the 2 o'clock position on the wheel, it rotated the wheel half a turn, thus activating 32 pivoting weighted levers, therefore if the leverage energy is tapped from the 32 falling levers, then the wheel has created leverage, kinetic energy from gravity in excess of the energy needed to rotate the balanced lever wheel. There is no laws to prevent free energy machines from working, the only prevention is bad design.
This experiment started as a out of balance wheel, then I realised that the real energy was in the falling levers leverage, and that the wheel was almost balanced, so the answer was in reverse, I had to make the wheel balanced and use the leverage (kinetic energy times the leverage ratio gained from gravity) of the falling levers to drive a propulsion system, to rotate the near balanced device with surplus torque. this was missed by all of the people who have studied the out of balance wheel theory's.
It takes less weight (energy/force) placed on the 2 o'clock position to move 32 levers a third of a turn, than it would to move a wheel with just one lever a third of a turn, that then is a gain in energy efficiency of 3,200%, thus the net kinetic energy gained from the falling levers per one rotation, must be compared to the net energy required to rotate the Whole lever system one rotation, thus there is surplus kinetic energy gained from gravity due to the efficiency of the device.
With this discovery I sold my house, hired a work unit and give up my job to give the free energy problem my full attention, thus this website. I Know my lever system will work, so I spent the last 3 years looking for a more simple way to extract rotary energy from gravity and buoyancy, this led to the rotary device on Page 1.
I have invested every thing I own to get this far, that’s about £350,000 pounds, I am now very frustrated that I have had to return to work and leave my inventions unfinished.
During the past 35 or so years I have built many experiments and have accumulated a large knowledge on the Free Energy subject. I have discovered that the Conservation of Energy Laws are miss quoted (used out of text), as with Newton third Law, and that science is in denial of this fact, this I put down to the lack of scientific research in this field due to lack of interest.
Contact me, Trevor Lyn Whatford, 51 Chestnut Avenue Dogsthorpe, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, England PE1 4JA Phone, Mobile +44(0)7703176182
4 Can gravity be used as fuel
A Conservative Force (Gravity) can not conserve Mechanical Energy, when using Non-conservative Mechanics.
A Conservative Force (Gravity), being used by Non-conservative Mechanics, equals energy conversion from a constant force.
This is my best explanation of the Multi Lever Phenomenon, and why it works, see pages two and three.
A Gravity Operated Lever is Mechanical Energy created from gravity, not mechanical energy conserved by gravity, it is mechanical energy created by gravity, so if mechanical energy can be created from a force, how can that force be considered a Conservative Force?, the answer is nobody considered gravity operated levers and leverage, so to save Science embarrassment I call Gravity Operated Levers, Non-conservative Mechanics.
Can Gravity be consumed, the quick answer is yes, A water wheel is total consumption of gravity, as it will not work in zero gravity as the water is weightless without gravity. A water wheel uses the kinetic energy of falling weight on one side of the wheel to gain energy from Gravity. The Multi Lever Phenomenon uses the kinetic energy of falling weight on both sides of the wheel to gain energy from Gravity due to the efficiency of a near counter balance, this rewrites the path and the energy required to move a weight from A to B and back again, the levers fall from the raised position on the left to there raised position on the right, and the levers that fall from there raised position on the right fall to there raised position on the left, thus the position B has been replaced with rotating levers in a near counterbalance state! this require a conservative force acting on each side of the wheel to keep the levers in that near counterbalance state, and a conservative force is needed to pull down the levers on both sides of the wheel! but the kinetic energy gained is not conserved by gravity as the energy gained from both sides of the wheels falling levers drives the wheel in the same direction! thus the wheel is using Non-conservative Mechanics. Forget one weight look at the energy required to turn a near balanced multi lever wheel one turn, in comparison to the energy you get from all the falling levers in one turn, that's Mechanical Advantage plain and simple!.
For every Law there are Loopholes!. Mechanical Laws look at the mechanical principles, if you use leverage and counterbalance, you would look at the energy input required to rotate the near balanced device, compared to the energy output you got out of the device's falling levers. The Multi Lever Phenomenon is the use of mechanical principles and that's how it should be calculated.
Proper analysis of a Wind Turbine shows that they are over unity device's that contravene the known Energy Laws, they create more energy than is put in!, the air is accelerated over the blades, this create a vacuum that pulls the blades forward, that is two energy plusses, the drag of the air leaving the blades is accelerated spinning air in vortexes that move with the wind, so that is energy created, the blades drive a 2 mega watt turbine, that's more energy created, the turbines create bearing friction, that's more energy created, the forward movement of the blades create what is called apparent wind which allows the blades to move faster than the wind, there is over unity there, after about a thousand metres the air sorts it self out and regains its normal flow, so where are the over 2 mega watt loses in the wind, that according to the Energy Laws most be there to create the 2 mega watts gained?. How many people would look at the Energy Laws for the use of Wind Turbines?, so why look at them for gravity motors?, if they work they will work, if they do not work, its not because they contravene the known Energy Laws, its because they are bad designs.
5 Hydrogen Peroxide Fuel Reactor Power Station
The answer to our Energy Problems, may be to build Hydrogen Peroxide Fuel Reactor Power Stations, using a system of different holding tanks, and the combined use of Steam Turbine's, Compressed Air Turbine's and Sterling Engines. These Power Stations would be cheaper, safer, and cleaner than, Fossil Fuels, and Nuclear Energy, the by-product is Oxygen, this was posted on this web site, on 20th October 2008, and will require its own web page, I will publish the Blue Prints for A Hydrogen Peroxide Power Station, when I get the time. This web site is just a fraction of my work.
The rapid expansion of the Reactor gasses drive a number of large Pistons, to Compress Air and send it into Holding Tanks, to drive Compressed Air Turbine's. There are a number of Heat Exchanging Coils used to drive Steam Turbine's in the conventional way, but then the lower pressure Steam is used to drive a system of Beam Engine's, this helps cool the Steam and reduces cooling Tower losses. the Waste Heat is channelled into Sterling Engine's where ever possible. The pressurized Reactor's hot Oxygen gasses, are also released through a Turbine and Sterling Engine, The Power Station will use a number of Control Valves and Control Systems, and multi Safety Valve's, and Safety feature's, all backed up with tethered blow Hatches. Added on, The pistons may not be required if a number of compressed air holding tanks are used instead, also the same turbines can be used for both steam and compressed air using duel nozzles or a number of both steam and air nozzles, this will cut down the building costs, the pistons where used to make cool compressed air to prevent compression loss when the air cools! if the holding tank system is used then the tanks must be well insulated!
6 Beam Engines
Beam Engines where thought to be inefficient, but when using waste steam they become very efficient, as there are no input energy costs. these could be installed in any Power Station using steam turbines, and could produce 160 mega watts from wasted energy every hour in the UK, how much would that be world wide, that is now wasted.
The Hydro Kinetic Turbine
The new improved turbine now runs on fluid, Mechanically Induced Out of Balance fluid weight!
The New fluid weight Hydro Kinetic Turbine
Improvements, to overcome the problems of the first model, by trying to keep it simple it had to much negative volume, it was always mentioned here that it should be made with castled sections and that is more or less the changes I have made to it, but now I have made it into a fluid weight turbine, (out of balance wheel) this is only made possible by cupping the water in the open reservoir and making shore the closed reservoir stay closed until they reach there opening position, in short needless volume have been removed and only working volume s remain, see the drawings below,
The first drawing shows a four reservoir wheel just to make it easy to draw and simple to see how it fits together!
The second drawing shows the compression wheel 1 with 8 reservoirs, compression wheel 2 will also have 8 reservoir making it a 16 reservoir turbine, there would be 6 full reservoirs on the descending side and 6 empty reservoirs on the ascending side of the turbine, there would be 4 reservoir exchanging fluid, the narrow point (maximum compression point) is at about 6.00 o'clock and the wide point is at 12.00 o'clock.
It would work as a recycling conventional water wheel!
Note This turbine can only work because it has a very efficient compression system as the force required to compress the bottom reservoir empty filling the top reservoir are far greater than most people would think! see below this drawing. The above is a win scenario wherein the bigger the wheel gets the more reservoirs can be added so the out of balance is increased, and is a greater distance away from the axle ( more torque ) this is just as long as the fluid weight in the exchange pipes is kept as low as practical.
The compression system
The rigid compression wheels compress the reservoirs empty at the bottom of the turbine thus filling the top reservoir these wheels rotate off the container or frame and are set at a suitable angle and tilt to best compress the reservoirs fluid weight to the maximum out of balance position. Because of their rigid nature the compression wheels rotate at preset angles so the reservoirs are compressed with the negative forces being driven into the wheel bearings or hubs making it easy to turn even with a high compression rate, this allows the out of balance fluid weight to gain leverage over the negative forces thus rotation is possible. the Compression Wheels can be hollow and used to transfer fluid or gas between the compressible compartment, the compression wheels may be slightly cone shaped or compression blocks can be used.
In this option paired reservoir are linked by a pipe having a U bend before the reservoir connection, there is a little air left in the system that works as a anti siphon device to keep the top reservoir from siphoning back to the bottom reservoir, this is a simple way to prevent the need for a valve system!